Comparison of adenosine magnetic resonance perfusion imaging with invasive coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
نویسندگان
چکیده
[2] Halligan SC, Gersh BJ, Brown Jr RD, et al. The natural history of lone atrial flutter. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:265–8. [3] NabarA, Rodriguez LM, Timmermans C, vandenDoolA, Smeets JL,WellensHJ. Effect of right atrial isthmusablationon the occurrenceof atrialfibrillation:observations in four patient groups having type I atrial flutter with or without associated atrial fibrillation. Circulation 1999;99:1441–5. [4] Moubarak G, Pavin D, Laviolle B, et al. Incidence of atrial fibrillation during very long-term follow-up after radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2009;102:525–32. [5] WhiteH,Boden-AlbalaB,WangC, et al. Ischemic stroke subtype incidenceamongwhites, blacks, and Hispanics: the Northern Manhattan Study. Circulation 2005;111:1327–31. [6] Shewan LG, Coats AJ. Ethics in the authorship and publishing of scientific articles. Int J Cardiol 2010;144:1–2.
منابع مشابه
Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.
AIMS Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging (CMRI) is a promising technique for non-invasive measurement of myocardial perfusion reserve. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an established invasive method for functional assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD). To prospectively assess the diagnostic value of CMRI for the detection of haemodynamically significant coronary lesions, compared...
متن کاملIncremental value of cardiac magnetic resonance with adenosine stress perfusion in coronary artery disease detection
Background A multiple-test strategy in often needed in the evaluation of patients (pts) with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has potential advantages in this context allowing simultaneous evaluation of ventricular function, myocardial perfusion and scar detection with high spatial resolution and no ionizing radiation exposure. We aimed to compare the di...
متن کامل3 Tesla is the preferred field strength for perfusion imaging in coronary artery disease – a comparison to 1.5 Tesla and fractional flow reserve
Background Adenosine perfusion imaging at 1.5 Tesla (T) has been shown to yield good diagnostic values in comparison to quantitative coronary angiography. Perfusion imaging at 3 T has the potential benefit of higher contrastand signalto-noise ratios. However, little is known about diagnostic performance of 3 T perfusion imaging in comparison to 1.5 T and in comparison to invasive measurement of...
متن کاملComparison of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography for the diagnosis and localization of coronary artery disease
Methods 22 patients with known or suspected CAD underwent both N-Ammonia PET and CMR adenosine stress and rest perfusion imaging prior to diagnostic coronary Xray angiography (CXA). CMR perfusion imaging was performed at 1.5T with a kt-accelerated steady-state free-precession sequence. Data analysis was blind. A significant coronary artery stenosis was defined as at least 70% diameter reduction...
متن کامل1.5 and 3 Tesla quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve in comparison to fractional flow reserve
Methods Thirty-four patients referred for coronary x-ray angiography with suspected or known coronary artery disease underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) at 1.5 and 3 Tesla, and additionally FFR measurement in LAD, CX and RCA. MPR was calculated in 544 myocardial segments at both field strenghts. FFR was measured in 109 coronary arteries with a cut-off value of ≤0.8 for relevant s...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- International journal of cardiology
دوره 147 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011